Comments on: Does Homeland serve as a commentary on U.S. homeland security laws? https://cliqueclack.com/p/homeland-security-commentary/ Big voices. Little censors. Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:43:24 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1 By: Sean https://cliqueclack.com/p/homeland-security-commentary/#comment-1909 Wed, 31 Oct 2012 17:37:50 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=3070#comment-1909 Keith: I thought last episode was a pretty obvious reference to provision 1021 of the 2012 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) :

“SEC. 1021. AFFIRMATION OF AUTHORITY OF THE ARMED FORCES OF
THE UNITED STATES TO DETAIN COVERED PERSONS
PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF MILITARY
FORCE.
(a) IN GENERAL.—Congress affirms that the authority of the
President to use all necessary and appropriate force pursuant to
the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40;
50 U.S.C. 1541 note) includes the authority for the Armed Forces
of the United States to detain covered persons (as defined in subsection
(b)) pending disposition under the law of war.
(b) COVERED PERSONS.—A covered person under this section
is any person as follows:
(1) A person who planned, authorized, committed, or aided
the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001,
or harbored those responsible for those attacks.
(2) A person who was a part of or substantially supported
al-Qaeda, the Taliban, or associated forces that are engaged
in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners,
including any person who has committed a belligerent act or
has directly supported such hostilities in aid of such enemy
forces.
(c) DISPOSITION UNDER LAW OF WAR.—The disposition of a
person under the law of war as described in subsection (a) may
include the following:
(1) Detention under the law of war without trial until
the end of the hostilities authorized by the Authorization for
Use of Military Force.”

https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/BILLS-112hr1540enr/pdf/BILLS-112hr1540enr.pdf

It’s a disgusting piece of legislation that gets next to no media coverage because Obama signed it, and Republicans love it.

]]>
By: Chuck https://cliqueclack.com/p/homeland-security-commentary/#comment-1652 Mon, 29 Oct 2012 05:56:02 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=3070#comment-1652 ‘Could it be that Showtime’s ‘Homeland’ isn’t really just about preventing one terrorist’s attack on the United States, but is instead about what powers the country has — and doesn’t have — in these matters?’

Nope. Its really just about preventing one terrorist’s attack on the United States

]]>