The Walking Dead finale: Boring? Or misunderstood?
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Was the season 3 finale of ‘The Walking Dead’ really that lackluster? Did it not live up to the hype and expectations?
Was the season 3 finale of ‘The Walking Dead’ really that lackluster? Did it not live up to the hype and expectations?
The second half of ‘The Walking Dead’s’ season has been building up to the inevitable war between the Prison and Woodbury, and it’s about time. Even the walkers seem to be aging waiting around for something to actually happen.
Why are so many willing to forgive Merle Dixon for his transgressions? He was an asshole through and through. You don’t reward behavior like that, you call it out for what it is.
The mid-season finale of ‘Revolution’ showed us more of the same: dimensionless characters, on-the-nose dialogue and plot holes big enough to fly a helicopter through. When will they turn this show around?
The penultimate episode of the first half of the season sets a terrific stage for the mid-season finale.
‘The Walking Dead’ characters react to the aftermath of last episode’s devastation, as the writers position their players for the inevitable confrontation between the prison gang and Woodbury.
They can’t all be gems. And episode 5 was a perfect example of what I never wanted to see ‘The Walking Dead’ become. Who’s with me?
Admit it: You didn’t see what was coming on “Killer Within.” Not by a long shot. Just one more reason (despite all the gruesome carnage) ‘The Walking Dead’ is a rockin’ (walkin’ … ???) good time.
‘Revolution’ and ‘The Walking Dead’. Two different apocalyptic shows in far different scenarios. But why is ‘TWD’ doing such a better job of pulling it off?
Wow. We’ve got one hell of a villain on ‘The Walking Dead.’ Look up “depravity” in the dictionary and you’ll find a picture of The Governor right beside it. And the kicker is we’ve probably just scratched the surface.