Elementary truly grows on you

elementary102084_0720b

By emphasizing Sherlock’s humanity and weakness alongside his intelligence, we no longer have an insufferable, hyperactive, two-dimensional know-it-all. Instead, we have a realistic character who can believably contribute to the Sherlock canon.

 

I gave CBS’s Elementary a pretty savage review over the summer. Actually, it wasn’t all that savage. I pointed out the good points and the bad points. Unfortunately, the uneven pacing, Jonny Lee Miller’s hyperactive Sherlock and the cartoonishly inadequate detectives outnumbered Lucy Liu’s understated Joan Watson and the excellent set/costume design. I’ve continued to watch the show in the ensuing weeks to see if it improved. It has. The writers no longer unnecessarily cram every single catch phrase and crazy Sherlockian habit into every odd minute in the show. The music no longer swells at inappropriate moments and they’re learning to let Sherlock breathe. Yes, sometimes the cops are still inexplicably stupid. If a high-profile Wall Street executive is found dead in his obsessive compulsive secret love den, wouldn’t you test the ONE thing found out of place in his apartment — the inexplicably unfinished salad? And, wouldn’t you ask his clearly cuckolded wife for her whereabouts at the time of his murder? Yes, you would. So, I didn’t understand why Detective Bell ridiculed Sherlock for making clear, logical suggestions.

But, outside of that, the show has improved and aligns with the original stories. Sherlock was obsessed with Chinese tattoos. So, having Sherlock speak Mandarin to a chef and letting Miller keep his personal tattoos makes sense. Sherlock frequently annoyed the hell out of Watson. When irritated, Watson typically challenged all of Sherlock’s assertions. But, Sherlock also loved “mentoring” Watson’s deductive skills. All those relationship aspects remain. Re-reading the stories as an adult, I get a strong homoerotic vibe between the two. There’s one story that stood out in my mind where Sherlock promises Watson that he reserved two double beds, but when they arrive there’s only one. Guess who wasn’t angry? It wasn’t Watson. If Watson were a woman back in the day, they totally would’ve gotten it on Victorian style.

This week’s episode truly helped me to see the old school Sherlock through its focus on Sherlock’s addiction and his pride.

However, this week’s episode showed the old school Sherlock by focusing on his addiction and his pride. Elementary’s premise surrounding Sherlock’s drug habits with Watson as his sober companion initially attracted me to the show. It was fresh and picked at a trait very few pre-1990s shows/films addressed. I read somewhere that Doyle introduced Sherlock’s cocaine/heroin habit to make the character less appealing. However, the drugs make him accessible to our contemporary society. Although the pilot glossed over Sherlock’s addiction, “Rat Race” let glints of reality shine through. Rather than write Sherlock as a totally cool, hyper crazy child, we see more humanity. We see more humility. And, we see more honesty. Sherlock’s one line about forgetting the smell of cooked heroin explained it all and I loved his final moments with both Watson and “Lestrade.”

CBS finally hit on Sherlock’s core. It isn’t his external skills or his frantic energy, but his internal failings and isolation. As a child reading Sherlock Holmes mysteries I only noticed Holmes’ kickbutt observational abilities. But, as an adult, I observed how Sir Conan Arthur Doyle quietly addressed his lead’s failings and separation from others. In the Elementary pilot, I assumed the producers focused on the flashier external shell because it looked cooler. It wasn’t. It just turned Sherlock into a two-dimensional cartoon. Luckily, they’ve realized their mistake. Like the original Sherlock Holmes, Elementary‘s Sherlock now incorporates more highs and lows with actual human foibles.

The more recent episodes delve into Holmes’ pride as a his Achilles heel. Allowing the child serial killer and murdering secretary to play on his weakest character traits, reminded me of Sir Conan Arthur Doyle’s writing style. He frequently commented on incredibly obvious cases, pointing out that if you read one mystery story you’ve already read his. I loved that cheeky self-awareness. Having the recent serial killers observe Sherlock observing them is smart. Plus, it harkens back to Doyle’s writing style.

The show can still improve how Sherlock interacts with other characters. Gregson’s sidekick should challenge Sherlock, but he shouldn’t dismiss blatantly obvious theories. In the novels, a lot of the inspectors attempted to “outsmart” Sherlock by pointing out bizarre clues that went nowhere. Not making Marcus a buffoon is smart. However, the novels highlighted the difference between police work and Sherlock’s work. While the police required tangibles before following leads, Sherlock could follow deductive theories. That hasn’t changed. Having Gregson, a cop whose training dictates he can’t look beyond hard evidence, use Sherlock — who can — makes sense. Letting us know that Gregson isn’t a complete idiot, who checked up on Sherlock, helps make the police characters look less one-dimensional. Although Marcus highlights the old school tension between Sherlock and cops, but I’d still like to see him not dismiss obvious clues either.

Overall, Elementary has grown on me. The cases are frequently becoming more complex. Admittedly, not all of old school Sherlock’s cases were that intricate. However, I greatly enjoyed the last two episodes. Elementary is improving and thank goodness for that.

Photo Credit: CBS

4 Comments on “Elementary truly grows on you

  1. Elementary is one of the few (rapidly dwindling #) of dramas that I can watch without losing interest. never really liked Lucy L til now…. she’s great as Joan. JLM’s reach as an actor is amazing…. made me completely forget his great portrayal of the buttoned-up lawyer he played so well in his last series.

  2. Interesting review!

    I’m puzzled, though, by your reference to “final moments with both Watson and ‘Lestrade’.” You do know that Gregson is actually a Conan Doyle character, and not a CBS substitute for Lestrade?

    Also, I’m not sure I understand your point about Conan Doyle’s style. Are you saying that making the mysteries very obvious (I’ve figured out every one at the first introduction of the villain, including guessing the child murders solution before the title sequence came on) is somehow intentional as a reference to a Conan Doyle disdain for mysteries in general?

    One point I disagree with is the idea that Miller having all those tattoos somehow makes sense just because the original Holmes made a study of tattoos. He studied them just as he studied tobacco ash, because it revealed something about the person. As Holmes was proud of his ability to disguise himself, it seems extremely unlikely that he would mark his body in such a way as to reveal his identity. With those complex tattoos, Miller may as well have his name printed down his arm and across his back. Very un-Holmes-like.

    • Hey Martha,

      Thanks for the well thought out comments. It makes for a good, positive debate.

      Regarding the “Lestrade” comment, I always viewed Lestrade as the main detective that Holmes interacted with, even though he did interact with others, like Gregson. I just assumed that the Elementary producers used Gregson over Lestrade because, well, Sherlock has that sher-locked down.

      I think you’ve combined two of my points into one. I liked the secretary and the child serial killer, because they showed tongue-in-cheek insight into Sherlock. And, Doyle had a very tongue-in-cheek style. He typically used other characters to comment on the narrative or obvious plot devices. So, using the secretary to point out Sherlock’s faults is smart.

      However, on a separate point, I know a lot of people, myself included panned the pilot for its simplicity. But, when I went back and re-read the plots I realized ‘ohmigosh, these plots are incredibly transparent.’ While Elementary’s cases are improving, it might have a few clunkers, but we shouldn’t pan the show stating it isn’t Holmes-worthy enough because ACD wrote a couple clunkers himself. But, I don’t believe the producers deliberately wrote bad cases to harken back to ACD, I think they were just getting their writing legs.

      In terms of the tattoos, we do need to update characters for the modern-day. I like all of the recent versions like the RDJ version and BBC that took small aspects of Holmes’ study/personality and made it into a more prominent characteristic. When the first Sherlock movie came out, a reviewer stated that Holmes’ boxing was very un-Sherlock-like, even though Sherlock did box and a prize-fighter claimed Sherlock could’ve had a burgeoning career. The tattoos fit for me because they’re going for a hipster-esque Sherlock. Just like the Nicotine Patches in BBC’s Sherlock fits his character. Considering Sherlock studied tattoos in the past, it isn’t a stretch he might appropriate them.

      True, Sherlock loves going undercover (but when would he take his shirt off going undercover?). However, I wouldn’t mind more scenes of a shirtless Johnny Miller ;)

      Thanks again for your thoughts and comments. They’re much appreciated!

  3. I’ve been really enjoying Elementary, I think both JLM and Liu are cast perfectly and the little “human moments” like you’ve mentioned make the series that much more round. First you get a little annoyed at Watson’s constant questions or nudging him about a possible relapse, and then you listen to him talking about the smell, and you realize, yeah, she’s right.

Powered By OneLink