Comments on: Seven reasons why Signs is the creepiest movie you didn’t see https://cliqueclack.com/p/signs-creepiest-movie/ Big voices. Little censors. Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:43:24 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1 By: Chuck https://cliqueclack.com/p/signs-creepiest-movie/#comment-5976 Mon, 26 Nov 2012 09:23:58 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=3164#comment-5976 Signs made almost $228 million in the US. I think a lot of people have seen it. That placed it sixth for the year. What else was out that year? 1. Spider-Man. 2. The Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers. 3. Star Wars, Episode II – Attack of the Clones. 4. Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. 5. My Big Fat Greek Wedding. 7. Austin Powers in Goldmember. 8. Men in Black II. 9. Ice Age. 10. Chicago. There were a lot of major movies not even in the Top Ten, including a Bond movie! It was one of four movies in the $200 millions. To crack the Top Ten among that group of films is a pretty big achievement. You talk about it like it was some kind of box office failure.

Maybe it’s “disappointing” numbers really came from the fact that the studio played it up as an alien invasion movie, and word of mouth dampened some of the enthusiasm when it didn’t really turn out to be that exactly (and the lack of on screen aliens didn’t help). Plus, it didn’t have a “twist ending,” an issue that has hampered Shayamalan to this day. Even at the press screening I attended — and the movie did freak me out a bit sitting in a large auditorium with a handful of people spread out all over the place — we were a little let down by the ending, waiting for the twist, expecting something big to happen. You can have a great movie up to the end, but that’s the last thing people will remember and if you don’t have a great ending, the word of mouth will kill a movie. It obviously didn’t fail because of that, but perhaps it could have made more if it had been marketed a little differently. And Shyamalan still had a lot to live up to at that point. He could probably make the same movie today and people would hail it as a masterpiece because his last batch of movies have been pure crap (in fact, he really hasn’t made a good movie since Signs).

]]>
By: slowmovement https://cliqueclack.com/p/signs-creepiest-movie/#comment-5722 Fri, 23 Nov 2012 09:40:42 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=3164#comment-5722 I highly appreciate this review. You nailed it! One of the few critics that really understood the movie’s topic! It’s about family, hurt, fear and how to overcome the pain from the loss and not at all a scifi-movie about an alien invasion. These deliberately stereotyped aliens are just the McGuffin for the psycholgical story.

]]>
By: Derek Diercksmeier https://cliqueclack.com/p/signs-creepiest-movie/#comment-2173 Sat, 03 Nov 2012 01:44:38 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=3164#comment-2173 This film is awful. M. Night Shyamalan has no talent.

]]>
By: Mike B https://cliqueclack.com/p/signs-creepiest-movie/#comment-1935 Thu, 01 Nov 2012 04:00:14 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=3164#comment-1935 I saw signs shortly after release at a resort Movie theater. I thought it was ok at the time but it soured on me when I saw it the second time. From the suicidal aliens and the lines in the movie just seem off. Nobody ever seems to talk right in the movie. I don’t know I guess it just rubs me the wrong way.

]]>
By: Ruby https://cliqueclack.com/p/signs-creepiest-movie/#comment-1932 Thu, 01 Nov 2012 03:26:11 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=3164#comment-1932 Signs is my favorite Shyalaman flick because it has a wonderful balance of humor, heart, and scary moments that don’t rely on gore. The Sixth Sense was far more clever and disturbing, but I have never wanted to watch it again because I’m scared of dead people covered in blood. Which is funny because I have no problem watching extremely violent, bloody movies – as long as they’re not in the horror genre.

]]>