Comments on: Star Trek Federation: The First 150 Years is a beautiful history book, but is it canon? https://cliqueclack.com/p/star-trek-federation-150-years-beautiful-history-book-canon/ Big voices. Little censors. Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:43:24 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1 By: David4 https://cliqueclack.com/p/star-trek-federation-150-years-beautiful-history-book-canon/#comment-49312 Sat, 12 Oct 2013 03:46:24 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=12889#comment-49312 Yeah the writer has to pick either the new timeline or the old, you can not mix them.

]]> By: Ivey West https://cliqueclack.com/p/star-trek-federation-150-years-beautiful-history-book-canon/#comment-49177 Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:59:30 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=12889#comment-49177 Yet this book contains Kirk’s birth from the Alternative Timeline but his subsequent history from the Original Timeline.

Original Kirk was born in Iowa. This book mixes those histories (the author discusses it in the linked interview, but I think his explanation confuses things even more).

]]> By: Jason G https://cliqueclack.com/p/star-trek-federation-150-years-beautiful-history-book-canon/#comment-49175 Tue, 08 Oct 2013 17:56:17 +0000 https://cliqueclack.com/p/?p=12889#comment-49175 I don’t see what the confusion is. In 2009’s film, it’s established onscreen that that movie (and all sequels following it) takes place in a parallel timeline.

This book is written from the original timeline point of view.

]]>