Because it reminded me of my freshman year — when I had a gymnast for a roommate, a cheerleader for an RA, and friends who intensely watched ESPN’s spring cheerleader finals — Hellcats appealed to me. My RA, with the heart of AU (gold), opened my eyes to the unreality of the one-dimensional stereotype. Allegedly, our college required cheerleaders to escort incoming male athletes around campus. Additionally, her team had difficulty getting funding for even the smallest item. I hoped Hellcats would give a peek into college athletics with a hint of parody. Although it tried, I don’t believe it did that.
Hellcats is essentially the first half of Bring it On where the rebellious dark angel joins the seemingly shallow Marie Antoinettes and they both learn about the other. Overall, the show appeared off acting wise, writing wise, and directing wise. It had promise in parts, but when the acting seemed slightly on, the writing and directing appeared off and vice versa. I wonder if the director could’ve done more to encourage their talent. Even though I liked the show’s visual arrangement, sometimes I felt s/he just focused more on the actors’ placement in the scene.
The Grouchy Stuff
So, my basic observations are below.
Marti, a 90s girl in a 21st century body. Why is Marti rocking grunge? I get that she’s an anti-establishment slacker, but is plaid the only signifier of teenage rebellion? Also, wearing cargo pants while doing backflips? Really? We get it. She damns the man. Now give her some spandex.
Adult Eye candy. Gail O’ Grady (NYPD:Blue) looks gorgeous and D.B. Woodside (Buffy, Grey’s Anatomy) is smoking. They’re also the reasons I feel the writing or directing is off. I’ve never cringed at their acting until now. I loved Sharon Leal, the cheerleading coach, in Boston Public. But, here, her character seems off.
Saved By The Bell: The College Years. Sometimes, I feel like TV writers attended college with Zack and Slater when they apply high school stereotypes to college characters. Who cancels scholarships mid-school year, even for unions? Yea, she’s poor. Yea, it’s costly. But, she didn’t consider filing a FAFSA for a semester? Also, mini persnickety point. Why do TV characters state they’re studying law, when it’s pre-law for undergrads?
Finally, if you’re giving us college kids, could they act their age? The mean girl cheerleader seemed a bit overdone. I might’ve preferred if she started out as Marti’s friend, but eventually turned away due to jealousy.
The actresses’ need to work harder. Ashley Tisdale plays her character’s warmth well, but I think the writers gave Savannah slightly more depth and intelligence than Tisdale portrays. Alyson Michalka does the sarcasm well but not the emotional vulnerability.
The dancing. I know Marti’s dance moves are supposed to look street but, to me, her freestyle appeared awkward and stiff (despite her chest pops and cheerleader faces). I find it hard to believe none of the cheerleaders ever incorporated hip hop in their ‘textbook’ moves, considering seemingly 60% of the routines shown on ESPN’s college nationals back in the day did so. Seriously. They aren’t ready for that?
Things that made me go hmmm:
The Good Stuff
While I doubt D.B. Woodside and Gail O’ Grady huddle in their trailers reminding themselves of better scripts, Hellcats has a unique dilemma. It’s taking on a topic typically reserved to the high school genre, but has located itself in the college plane, allowing for more adult situations. However, if it continues to locate 18-22 year olds in the 14-18 realm (pulling a reverse of Gossip Girl), I don’t know why they didn’t just go with high schoolers. Plus, although they tried to overcome the bitchy cheerleader type with the Savannah character, the Alison character keeps it going. I’m more interested in their nationals trials and funding fights.
Final Thoughts
I’ve noticed most pilot scripts/pilots/first eps I’ve reviewed so far, save the one show that won’t air in the fall, I either felt ambiguous towards or felt they needed work. I won’t lie. I like the show’s warmth and will probably watch it a couple more times before finally turning it off, but as with Nikita this is a show that has a lot of wrinkles to iron straight.
What do you guys think? Was I too hard or do you feel the show’s warmth will overcome all? Sound off!
I saw a much earlier version of the Pilot, and thought the additions of DB Woodside (Despite not being given a whole lot to do) and Aaron Douglass were a good bit of casting/writing. I only watched the first half (Something between Psych and Hard Knocks, but I’ll be finishing it up tonight.
*POST AUTHOR*
When you look at the older cast members, ‘Hellcats’ has a lot of seasoned star power. I love that Gail O’Grady throws herself into the role and I’m happy to see D.B. Woodside (who I felt brought his A-game even in his walk-on role on ‘Gray’s Anatomy’ as Bailey’s old crush), but it almost feels like a waste of talent. But, I wouldn’t mind hearing your final thoughts –
OMG – everything you say is true. And yet I loved it. It reminded me of watching my other guilty pleasure, Secret Life of the American Teenager. Wooden acting, cliche characters…but it all fits together for me in such a way I can’t turn it off. I’m dooooomed.
*POST AUTHOR*
I have to admit, ‘Hellcats’ is one of those shows where you’ll walk away calling it ‘terrible teen tv,’ but then find yourself returning the next week to watch it again. It has possibility, but I wonder if the CW will take the time to develop it -
If they’ve paid any attention to the success of ABC Family, they would take the time. But they’re not known the greatest decisions.
I really enjoyed ‘HellCats’ it won its time slot and you have to give the shoe just like other shows a chance to grow more and i do believe it will live up to the hype. There are other shows i wish would go away. Gail o grady is one of the reasons i watch, because she is one of my favorite actresses.