CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

What’s this show called … True Blood?

Each week I review a show that's new to me. Good idea, or punishment (mine or yours)? You be the judge. But either way, if I had to watch it, the least you can do is read what I have to say....

In full disclosure, I saw an episode or two of True Blood back when it first premiered in 2008. Needless to say, at the time I wasn’t impressed … although that did have a lot to do with the fact that I’m not a vampire guy. I thought it only fair to forewarn you that I’d once passed on this series.

So why bother with it now? Not, as many of you may be thinking, for the opportunity to rag on the show. No, it’s actually due to True Blood’s success that I’ve returned. The fact is that I’ve read a ridiculous amount about the show since the middle of its second season, and what I’ve gleaned about it in short is that the series is as much a great drama as it is a vampire showcase. Sometimes it’s what else a show is that matters most; that’s what makes us not mind the fact that the show we like is about gymnasts, or serial killers, or drug dealers … or blood suckers.

And remember, this is based on last week’s episode; I wouldn’t have had the chance to catch last night’s in time.

I did find myself a bit lost in the whirlpool (cesspool?) that True Blood swirls around in, but I appreciated the fact that, unlike with some other shows that I’ve checked out while writing my column, I was able to hook into most, if not all, of the plots by the end of the hour. The great James Frain, here playing Franklin Mott, kidnapped Tara (Rutina Wesley) with the intention of making her his vampire bride — I loved that romantic proposal! I was surprised (impressed?) that he hadn’t taken her to the land of the eternally undead on night one.

I wasn’t quite clear on whether Bill (Stephen Moyer) was undercover … creepy lady said he was acting out of character, but King Russell (Denis O’Hare) didn’t appear to be under the illusion that Bill was on his side. Plus he went to save Sookie (Anna Paquin), who’s currently on the run with Alcide (Joe Manganiello) after some trouble with a wolf pack that hangs with the bloodsuckers.

I enjoyed Eric’s (Alexander Skarsgard) flashback to his life as a Viking prince (is he “Eric the Red?”) … if vampires murdered his family, why did he become one? To seek vengeance? How’d he guess that it would take this long, thereby necessitating him to become one of the undead? I have to say that he’s the only one on the show with the “look” of a vampire.

I was confused by Jason (Ryan Kwanten), who if I remember correctly was a sex addict who murdered someone (a vampire?) in the pilot. Now he’s trying to land a job with the sheriff’s department? Chris Bauer was one of the highlights of The Wire season 2, and I love seeing him whenever I can, but his role here as Acting Sheriff Andy was a little painful.

The best parts of the episode were Jason and Crystal (Lindsay Pulsipher) — I couldn’t stand him otherwise — and Lafayette (Nelsan Ellis), who isn’t all that interesting, but at least seemed “real.” And I suppose the coming vampire war, with its infusion of werewolf violence, will be interesting to people who go for that sort of thing.

But a lot of the rest seemed like a bad porno — not as far as nudity is concerned (I got a tame episode), but rather in that acting and writing seem secondary to visually arresting images and scenes, in this case vampire violence. Is it normal for the vampires to walk around covered in blood, like Russell, Bill, and creepy lady did? And those God-awful Southern accents? Ouch.

And in what’s sure to offend most everyone who loves the show, possibly the worst part about it was Sookie. I was disappointed to see that she was still mind reading whenever she thought it her right to invade other people’s thoughts, using that stolen knowledge for her own purposes.

But even that was overshadowed by how poor of an actress one would think Paquin to be, were this their only exposure to her. She’s not lacking in talent, although I’ve never seen The Piano so couldn’t tell you how she did in it, I’m no fan of the X-Men trilogy, and she’s the only part I didn’t like about the otherwise awesome 25th Hour. With all of that, I know this isn’t showcasing Paquin in a true light. She was just so lifeless, so un-emotive, so stiff. And telling me that she’s nominated yet again for some award or another won’t change what I perceived when witnessing her performance for myself.

There are shows that air on HBO because HBO airs excellent original programming — The Sopranos, The Wire, Big Love, Treme, Rome, Band of Brothers, Oz, Six Feet Under, Deadwood, to name a few — and there are shows that air on HBO because pay cable lets you curse, kill, and get naked. I didn’t find True Blood to be a member of the latter, purely exploitive group, but in no way is it in my mind a member of the former class of excellence. I could see getting into a bunch of the plots, but as a whole — even if I could look past the vampires — I just wasn’t impressed.

But call me when Eric kills King Russell and goes back to sleeping with that barmaid.

41zznyf6C L. SL160 True Blood Eric Northman revealed 41aejO9hA9L. SL160 True Blood Eric Northman revealed

Photo Credit: HBO

8 Responses to “What’s this show called … True Blood?”

July 26, 2010 at 5:34 PM

Confession: I don’t get it either. I watched the first 2 episodes. The “campiness” felt forced and it felt like Paquin was out of her depth as an actress. (To be fair, her body of work has been very ‘Meh’ for the most part, but she’s young.) Also, the Louisiana accents were all wrong and all very, very bad. Hearing from you that everything is the same 2 years later makes me feel a lot better.

However, I appreciate the fact that every time someone says that this show is awesome, somewhere in the world a Twilight fan’s head explodes. That’s something we can all get behind.

July 27, 2010 at 10:47 AM

Forgive my naivete, but is that you saying something good about Twilight, or something bad? :)

July 27, 2010 at 5:44 PM

I have a pair of nieces that squeal (and that’s a. literal. squeal.) at the mention of Edward/Bella/et. al. They forced me to watch the first one and I gave up after 15 minutes. I went to TheMovieSpoiler to get a synopsis just in case I missed something and as far as I can tell the Twilight series is about how important it is to have a boyfriend. Seriously.

Twilight is poorly written, poorly acted and probably bad for you if you are a tween-age girl.

July 28, 2010 at 1:16 PM

I have all the movie channels, so we’re willing to try most new things that make it to TV. We made it through roughly 3 minutes of the first Twilight movie, and I still blame those lost minutes of my life on my wife! :)

July 27, 2010 at 10:48 AM

I’m all for the explosion of Twilight fans, LOL!

I couldn’t get into True Blood at all, and I agree Sookie is extremely weak. I love the books, and Sookie is strong and spunky and the opposite of how she’s portrayed on TB. They just did a terrible job of capturing everything fun about the books (though I will give them that Alcide is perfectly cast).

July 27, 2010 at 5:07 PM

I’m with you completely. I keep hearing nothing but raves about what a great show it is–I watched it the first season, and it was good/fair for the first few episodes; it went into what I would call its weird period, and went downhill from there. I don’t even bother to TIVO it anymore.

August 1, 2010 at 4:21 AM

It’s a pity if you dont get the terrible beauty and the allegoric part of the show… Stop looking for “plots” and scrutinize the themes that Tru Blood is all about… How our world is full of differences we must bear for the worst and for the best (pour le meilleur et pour le pire) like we say in french… How all these interactions are tremendously cruel, even dangerous, and at the same time absolutely beautiful when we look at them from the right angle… How the fierce battle between our passions and the rules of society never ends… How true love is, to some extent, all about biting, drinking the blood and hurting the flesh of our beloved ones… Beside taking care of them… All this vampire-werewolf-shapeshifter-meynade thing is an allegory about us… Don’t turn it to a police inquiry or an Agatha Christie novel looking for who is who or who did what… At the end, it’s of little interest…

August 2, 2010 at 1:21 PM

The allegory may be a theme of the show, but certainly it needs to be critiqued on a plot basis. All series need be. A television show can’t stand on the strength of its underlying message alone. A play, maybe. A movie or book? Possibly. But not a TV show.

Powered By OneLink