CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

Person Of Interest – Even if you paid close attention, you still got twisted

The complex first outing of 'Person Of Interest' left me feeling it might have a tough go at finding an audience. Jam-packing so much into the premiere episode was a big gamble.

- Season 1, Episode 1 - "Pilot"

WowZah. This was an action-packed premiere filled with somewhat calculated drama and convoluted plot twists.

But … Person Of Interest has got an interesting premise:

“Eight million people. You know what they all have in common: None of them knows what happens next. Someone is murdered in New York City every 18 hours. At the end of the day, one of these people will be gone.” – Mr. Finch

“There are things that happen to people every day. You can’t stop that.” – John Reese

“What if you could? Not the things that happen in the heat of the moment, but so many crimes are planned … days, weeks in advance. What if you could stop those? I’ve got a list … a list of people who are about to be involved in very bad situations.” – Mr. Finch

John Reese (James Caviezel) is an ex-CIA hitman. Mr. Finch (Michael Emerson) has apparently followed Reese and sought him out for this own devices. Finch is a brilliant millionaire who once worked for the government and now monitors people whose lives’ details could possibly reveal inevitable crimes … whether against them or otherwise.

With lines such as “You left the government because they lied to you … I never will,” I can’t help but give Finch a nod for his intrigue. But he’s not as convincing as you’d expect. He can persuade you … but not overwhelmingly so. And only to a point. I enjoy the characters Emerson portrays, but he gets lost in all the complexity of this vehicle.

Same goes for Caviezel. His cliched down-and-out government assassin with too many unique abilities fits the bill a little too neatly. The thing is, he definitely needed all those abilities in order to accommodate all the twists and turns this episode pulled out of its hat.

That “list of people” Finch mentioned? He got if from a government system he developed to monitor cell phones and other communications after the tragedies of 9/11. Finch’s system helped to shed light on all sorts of crimes — relevant and irrelevant. At some point, Finch got a conscience and decided to do something about them … especially where there were lives at stake. He mysteriously refers to himself as a “concerned third party” in the game. We’ll see down the line how this pans out in the grand scheme of things.

Sounds like fun, doesn’t it? But this program had me confused. A lot of the action was pretty in its own way, but damn … was some of it baffling. Literally. I want to like Person Of Interest, but I don’t want to have to work at it in order to do so.

“The world thinks we’re both dead,” Finch told Reese at one point. We’ll see. After all, J.J. Abrams‘ name is attached to this new fall entry. That could mean anything going forward.

Notes:

  • Spiffy background music swirls in and out of the program. I caught a lot of nods from Heat with DeNiro and Pacino.
  • The way Finch threw out needed identities, credit cards and more at Reese added to the way-too-cushy feel of the program for me.
  • Reese’s past life with the CIA afforded him a leg up on his initial mission. A bit too easily and comfortably for my taste. I’m being picky, but I want to see more “messy” in this show. Things are just too systematic. I trust it to flesh itself out in the coming weeks.
  • I do like Reese playing a kind of asshole, however. But … I didn’t like some of the indiscriminate killing he committed.
  • Finch: “Sooner or later, both of us will probably wind up dead. Actually dead this time. I said I’d tell you the truth … didn’t say you’d like it.” If this series doesn’t step up and find itself, that statement may be truer than one thinks.

 

Photo Credit: CBS

13 Responses to “Person Of Interest – Even if you paid close attention, you still got twisted”

September 23, 2011 at 1:10 PM

This sounds like a loose take on Human Target but without the fun interactions between the lead characters.

September 23, 2011 at 2:23 PM

I thought Reese went out of his way to avoid killing. Most were shot in the legs. I enjoyed the show.

September 23, 2011 at 6:56 PM

Hmmmm…. Heat would be a very good movie to watch this weekend.

September 23, 2011 at 9:49 PM

I liked it. Nah, actually I kind of loved it!
So glad to see Ben Linus back again that maybe I was ready to overlook some stuff, but still, it was a great hour, and I will keep watching. Not to mention, Reese cleans up soooo pretty……

September 23, 2011 at 10:06 PM

Not enough Emerson. He’s in a completely different show than the other guy, who seems to solve all his problems by shooting people. I don’t think that character or the actor is capable of being anything more than a thug. Caveziel gave a wooden performance. I wish instead they’d have cast someone with some personality, some charm, some cleverness–someone who maybe could stop these crimes using his brain instead of his gun. Then they’d have something interesting.

September 23, 2011 at 11:55 PM

Michael…are you complaining about complicated television? For shame, sir! For shame.

September 24, 2011 at 1:18 AM

. . . . .

Tom::

Not in the least.

I love complicated television. Convoluted television I do not like. Let me explain:

Convoluted television has twists and turns that lead nowhere. Convoluted television is a bunch of forks in the road that lead in different directions and do not meet. Convoluted television is a mess. Convoluted television is confusing. Oft times, it can be baffling.

Convoluted television is not to be confused or equated with complicated television.

Complicated television is welcome. Lost was often complicated television. (It was sometimes convoluted, but it purposefully led you somewhere.) I love it as you well know. Complicated television was Millennium. I love it, too.

You may have been waylaid by my statement “I want to like Person Of Interest, but I don’t want to have to work at it in order to do so.”

I did not mean that to signal the raising of a white flag, as is evidence of my last line “That could mean anything going forward”, my dear, good sir.

September 24, 2011 at 1:31 AM

I think at this point in the series it’s entirely possible that what appears to be convoluted will turn out to be complicated. I understand your concerns and even agree with some of them, but this is an Abrams show so we both know these things could end up being positives after a few more episodes have aired. You know, ironing out the kinks and all that.

Besides, I hope you realize I was just ribbing you after the recent Doctor Who article. I never take anything seriously, I leave that to the adults.

September 24, 2011 at 1:35 AM

. . . . .

Of course I know you were ribbing me.

My response was my attempt to be “adult” about it.

Did it work?

Were you convinced? Impressed?

Where’s my cookie, dammit … ?!??!?

September 24, 2011 at 1:45 AM

It sort of sounded adult, but I work with a gaggle of immature computer geeks so I really don’t get to see many examples of what an adult acts like. When I do I’m usually bored and start whining about wanting to go home, but everyone says I just need a nap.

I like cookies.

September 24, 2011 at 1:50 AM

. . . . .

Woooooot … !!!

COOKIES FOR EVERYONE … !!!

September 24, 2011 at 2:50 PM

From here on out whenever I watch this show I’m going to get an irresistible craving for cookies. Eventually I’ll forget why, but I’ll start calling the show “Cookie of Interest” and people will shun me.

Thanks a lot Michael!

September 24, 2011 at 10:33 AM

A lot of things going on so I kind of miss the beginning and some in between. Overall I like it. It’s different, it’s out there. It does kind of surprise me that it’s so easy for him to just shoot people though like someone pointed out here he shot the leg… It can be potentially my new fave, though I missed human target.

Powered By OneLink