CliqueClack TV
TV SHOWS COLUMNS FEATURES CHATS QUESTIONS

Have I betrayed my people? – Monthly Musings

Why didn’t last year’s shows with African-American leads do well? Could I have done something to support them? Were 'Undercovers,' 'Criminal Minds: Suspect Behavior' and 'HawthoRNe' really that bad?

When I look at the African-American headed shows that premiered and failed in the past couple years (Undercovers), or whose leads came and went (Criminal Minds: Suspect Behavior, CSI), I wonder why I didn’t do more to support them.

Back in the ’80s and ’90s, whenever shows headed by African-Americans appeared, I, my family members, and our immediate social circle dashed out to support them. When Dihann Carroll premiered in Dynasty, suddenly my eighth grade self could legally watch the show. When Generations, the all African-American NBC soap, debuted, my mother set our VCR to tape it every day. When Mario Van Peebles’s Sonny Spoon hit the airwaves, I watched EVERY SINGLE episode, until they cancelled it. Whenever  a show featuring African-American or minority characters in the core cast, it suddenly became my instant favorite from the Young Riders (think a low-rent version of Young Guns) to 21 Jump Street to Silver Spoon. But, I won’t lie, these were also good shows. At the same time, although I loved Family Ties, Growing Pains, Small Wonder, Alf, Mr. Belvedere, MASH, Murphy Brown, Taxi, Golden Girls, Quantum Leap, etc., I also loved California Dreams for its increasingly multi-racial cast.

Although shows with African-Americans in the lead cast increased in the ’90s, they still remained a relative rarity. I cried when the brilliantly written Roc went off the air, ceasing to showcase the talents of Charles S. Dutton and Rocky Carroll. I wished the smartly written Living Single had a larger audience. When Showtime turned the 1997 film Soul Food into a TV series, my mother’s friends either registered for cable or upgraded their subscriptions to watch it.

However, as shows with an all-Black cast  increased at the century’s turn, I still felt unsatisfied. A lot of the new shows didn’t strike me as smart or well-written when juxtaposed with similar shows I remembered from the ’80s. My Wife and Kids was essentially King of Queens which was essentially According to Jim (which was essentially not good). I never liked The Game’s CW pilot and the less I say about Tyler Perry the better. In one way, these shows increased televised diversity, which I greatly appreciated. But, I didn’t just want presence. I wanted to see more African-Americans in smart, mainstream shows.

Luckily, shows featuring characters of African descent as the second lead increasingly appeared (Scrubs, Psych). Even better, these characters weren’t “the Black character” (put there to assuage angry voices like mine *cough, cough* Betty Applewhite *cough*) but well-written, well-developed figures “who happened to be Black.” And, I thought, “Finally! Mainstream TV gets us. They’re not just writing the ‘Black’ character, who is defined by his/her race, but a character who is human and defined by his/her personality.” I did a little Snoopy dance of joy. But, still I wasn’t satisfied.

Then, in the past two years, we saw an increase of mainstream shows with *gasp* African-American leads (Criminal Minds: Suspect Behavior, CSI ) or African-American casts (Undercovers). I was ecstatic. We had reached the pinnacle. Mainstream TV finally understood and recognized us as an audience.

But … I didn’t watch.

That’s right …

I didn’t watch them.

I loved Criminal Minds: Suspect Behavior (CM:SB). I found it well-done, well-written and well-acted. Forest Whitaker proved an apt lead. When the characters referenced him as a genius, I actually believed them. A smart actor playing a smart character – who woulda thunk it? I also loved Janeane Garofalo’s feminist liberal character. Seeing her on the small screen reignited my ’90s love for her. Plus, any show featuring a hot British actor I’ll watch at least once. So, why didn’t I watch CM:SB? Well, the storylines felt EXACTLY like Criminal Minds. EXACTLY. What’s the point of making the group red cell, when the writers didn’t show a difference in the cases or the formula? I stopped watching CM:SB because it felt like déjà vu, with different faces.

In some ways the producers did everything I wished CBS had done concerning NCIS:LA’s premiere. They didn’t overhype CM:SB (or its stars) and they didn’t invert the CM formula. Plus, keeping the pilot low key gave the show time to grow. But, NCIS:LA succeeded because they DID hype it (both the show and its star power). And, they changed the formula so you didn’t watch the SAME show twice. I hated NCIS:LA’s first season, but it’s still on the air. CM:SB isn’t. I hoped they’d at least make CM:SB less torture porn centric, but, they didn’t EVEN do that. So, I stopped watching and then CBS cancelled it.

I loved Undercovers’ pilot, but mid-way through the season I stopped watching. Each episode proved well-acted and well-written. And, any show featuring Major Dad tugs my soft spot. But the show went from a hot, sexy, passionate Mr. And Mrs. Smith to a too-cute-for-comfort-couply-focused Hart to Hart. Seriously, how can you go from Brad and Angie to an ‘80s show with shoulder pads? Frustrated, I stopped watching and then NBC shelved it.

Although I loved Jada Pinkett-Smith as an actress and Michael Vartan’s hotness, I couldn’t stand watching HawthoRNe. Outside of the two lead actors, the hospital’s other storylines seemed saccharine and annoying. I didn’t really care about the other bland nurses and plotlines. So, I stopped watching. And TNT stopped producing it.

So, I wonder, did I fail my people? What happened to the culturally-ingrained fanaticism my mother drilled into me in the ’80s and ’90s? If I had watched these shows each week and hyped them to my friends, would they have stayed on? When I asked my brother why he didn’t watch Undercovers, he stated he figured the networks wouldn’t keep minority-led shows on the air and he didn’t want to get attached. So, is that why these shows failed? Is it because of the writing, the leads’ race, or people just feared getting attached?

While we still have shows with African-Americans characters as secondary leads (Grimm, Psych), 2009-2011 proved a great time for trying new leads with different skin tones. Yes. We still have smart mainstream-geared shows with African-Americans in the lead (House of Lies) or a core African-American cast (Key & Peele), but when I look at shows I love like Grimm or Psych, I wonder. What if Russell Hornsby’s Griffin played the lead? What if Psych focused on Gus over Shawn?

I like TV. In fact I love TV. But, every now and again I want to see myself reflected in it, as I see myself  — not as the “Chocolate Columbo” sidekick, but as the lead.

 

Photo Credit: NBC

Categories: | Clack | Columns | General | Monthly Musings | News | TV Shows |

4 Responses to “Have I betrayed my people? – Monthly Musings”

February 6, 2012 at 6:32 PM

I loved Undercovers but did start to drift a bit myself for the reasons you said. Never even BOTHERED with Criminal Minds: SB to be honest, but mostly I found the concept a bit ridiculous, particularly when you realize they had a built in spin off concept with the real life unit having spawned The Academy Group and those guys deserve a decent show about them after Millennium turned them into an apocalyptic religious cult.

February 7, 2012 at 1:43 PM

I LOVE your Monthly Musings! And no, you haven’t betrayed your people; in fact, you’ve done a good thing. I don’t think anyone wants to watch bad TV no matter what color skin the leads have. By not watching the mediocre / bad shows, you’re driving the Powers That Be to set the bar higher and produce quality shows. I tried Undercovers (and not b/c the leads were black or because they were two of the most beautiful people I’ve ever seen) b/c the story had potential. That’s what makes people watch TV, and if the shows are good, everyone will watch.

February 7, 2012 at 8:35 PM

Thanks, Boss. Your encouragement is always much appreciated! :)

February 7, 2012 at 7:26 PM

I didn’t give Undercovers a chance because Abrams’s name was plastered all over the promos, and I had been burned by Alias, Star Trek, and what I read and heard about LOST. And while I saw a lot of advertisements on NBC itself, I noticed virtually none outside the network, as they were too busy plugging other shows that failed that season. Finally, while having both leads be African-American might have hurt its mainstream chances for survival, I think a far worse strike against it was being spit out near the end of the Zucker regime. How many shows with all-white casts were sacrificed to a failing network at that same time?

I watched the CMSB pilot, but since I had already abandoned the mothership at that time, felt no strong attachment to the spinoff, and was already tiring of NCIS:LA as well.

If Hornsby and Giuntoli switched on Grimm, my only regret would be that the network probably would feel the need to switch Tulloch out for a non-white actress, and I like what she’s been doing on the show. On the plus side, the lead cop/Grimm would then be capable of exhibiting actual emotions rather than blandness.

The only thing I disagree about is Psych. Shawn and Gus are so equal, so complementary, and so co-dependent that I’ve never viewed Gus as simply the sidekick. Sure, Shawn’s father and (finally) girlfriend are regulars, but Gus has his own relationships with both as well. In his mind, I’m sure he is the lead, especially when he shifts into smooth playboy mode.

Have you watched NewsRadio? This essay immediately brought to mind Khandi Alexander’s scene from the “Daydream” episode.

In the end, we haven’t the time to watch nearly as many shows as we did as children, particularly ones that aren’t excellent or compelling, but merely strike a personal chord or agenda. I’ve got a couple on my DVR that annoy me, but that I continue to watch anyway just because they’re genre or feature a particular supporting actor, so I do commend you for having the willpower to reject the shows you listed above.

Powered By OneLink